Ferr – Cancer of Unknown Primary

Cancer of Unknown Primary

  • Ritesh Rathore, M.D.

 Basic Information

Definition

Carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) refers to a diverse group of malignancies for which the anatomic site of origin cannot be determined despite extensive investigations.

Synonyms

  1. Cancer NOS

  2. Cancer unspecified site

  3. Malignancy unspecified site

  4. CUP

ICD-10CM CODES
C80.1 Malignant (primary) neoplasm, unspecified

Epidemiology & Demographics

  1. CUP accounts for about 5% of all cancers, and the annual incidence in the United States is 7-12 cases per 100,000 persons.

  2. It is the seventh most frequent common cause of cancer and the fourth most common cause of cancer death. It predominantly occurs in adults and is more common in males.

  3. In the United States, an estimated 33,770 new cases are expected in 2017.

  4. Most cases of CUP are carcinomas, which are divided into adenocarcinomas (90%), squamous cell carcinomas (5%), and undifferentiated carcinomas (5%).

  5. There is a variable rate of mutations detected in CUP (18%-30%). The tumor suppressor gene p-53 has overexpression rates (40%-50%) or mutation rates (25%-40%) that are comparable to that seen in other solid tumors. The evaluation of VEGF-A (vascular endothelial growth factor-A, angiogenesis factor) and matrix metalloproteinases (enzymes that degrade stroma) showed that these are universally expressed and active angiogenesis is present in CUP.

Physical Findings & Clinical Presentation

  1. Physical findings can be variable and include generalized and organ-specific findings.

  2. General findings can include cachexia, pallor, edema, icterus, edema, skin rash, muscle wasting among others.

  3. Organ-specific findings are related to the dysfunction of the underlying organ(s) involved with CUP.

  4. The clinical course is often highlighted by a short presentation history, with symptoms and signs associated with metastatic sites, early dissemination, aggressive clinical course, and occasionally an unpredictable metastatic pattern.

  5. Multiple organs are involved at diagnosis in up to half of patients.

  6. The clinicopathologic subsets comprising CUP are shown in Table 1.

    TABLE1 Clinicopathologic Subsets of Patients with CUPFrom Pavlidis N, Pentheroudakis G: Cancer of unknown primary site, Lancet 379(9824):1428-1435, 2012.
    Median Age (Years) Sex of Patients (M/F) Histopathology
    Lymph nodes
    Mediastinal retroperitoneal <50 70%/30% UDF or PDF
    Axillary 52 0%/100% Adenocarcinoma (WDF, MDF, or PDF)
    Cervical 57-60 80%/20% SCC
    Inguinal 58 50%/50% UDF, SCC, mixed SCC and adenocarcinoma
    Peritoneal cavity
    Primary peritoneal in women 55-65 0%/100% Adenocarcinoma (serous papillary)
    Ascites of other unknown origin Adenocarcinoma (MDF or PDF; mucin; with or without signet ring cells)
    Neuroendocrine tumors 63 60%/40% PDF with neuroendocrine features; low-grade neuroendocrine cancers; small-cell anaplastic cancers
    Liver (mainly) or other organs, or both 62 61%39% Adenocarcinoma (MDF or PDF)
    Lungs
    Pulmonary metastases Adenocarcinoma (WDF, MDF, or PDF)
    Pleural effusions Adenocarcinoma (MDF or PDF)
    Bones (one or more) Adenocarcinoma (WDF, MDF, or PDF)
    Brain (one or more) 51-55 M>F Adenocarcinoma (WDF, UDF, or PDF); SCC

    F, women; M, men; MDF, moderately differentiated; PDF, poorly differentiated; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma; UDF, undifferentiated; WDF, well differentiated.

Diagnosis

Workup

  1. Comprehensive medical history

  2. Complete physical examination with particular attention to skin, lymph node sites, organ enlargement, and testes; also rectal examination and pelvic examination (in women) (Table 2)

    TABLE2 Recommended Evaluation Following Initial Light Microscopic DiagnosisFrom Goldman L, Schafer AI: Goldman’s Cecil medicine, ed 24, Philadelphia, 2012, Saunders.
    Diagnosis Clinical Evaluation Special Pathologic Studies
    Adenocarcinoma (or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma) PET CT of chest, abdomen Men: serum PSA Women: mammogram Additional directed radiologic or endoscopic studies to evaluate abnormal symptoms, signs, laboratory values Men: PSA stain Women: estrogen and progesterone receptor stains (if clinical features suggest metastatic breast cancer)
    Poorly differentiated carcinoma PET CT of chest, abdomen Serum hCG, AFP Additional directed radiologic or endoscopic studies to evaluate abnormal symptoms, signs, laboratory values Immunoperoxidase staining Electron microscopy (if immunoperoxidase stains indeterminate)
    Squamous carcinoma, cervical nodes PET Direct laryngoscopy with visualization; biopsy of nasopharynx, pharynx, hypopharynx, larynx Fiberoptic bronchoscopy (if laryngoscopy is negative)
    Squamous carcinoma, inguinal nodes PET Complete examination of perineal area (including pelvic examination) Anoscopy Cystoscopy

    AFPα-fetoprotein; CT, computed tomography; hCG, human chorionic gonadotropin; PET, positron emission tomography; PSA, prostate-specific antigen.
  3. Histopathology review of biopsy specimens

Laboratory Tests

  1. Complete blood count

  2. Comprehensive chemistry panel

  3. Urine analysis

  4. Stool for occult blood

  5. Tumor markers (in selected cases): prostate-specific antigen (PSA), β-human chorionic gonadotrophin, α-fetoprotein.

  6. Adequate tissue biopsy with immunohistochemical (IHC) staining is done to guide broad diagnostic category assignments—carcinoma, melanoma, sarcoma, or lymphoma.

  7. Subtyping with IHC panels helps further classifying into adenocarcinoma, squamous carcinoma, germ cell tumor, neuroendocrine, thyroid, hepatocellular, or renal origin.

  8. Step-wise approach for IHC derived diagnosis of likely site of origin are depicted in Table 3.

    TABLE3 Immunohistochemical Approaches for Diagnosis of CUPFrom Pavlidis N, Pentheroudakis G: Cancer of unknown primary site, Lancet 379(9824):1428-1435, 2012.
    Diagnosis
    Step One
    AE1 or AE3 pan-cytokeratin Carcinoma
    Common leukocyte antigen Lymphoma
    S100; HMB-45 Melanoma
    S100; vimentin Sarcoma
    Step Two
    CK7 or CK20; PSA Adenocarcinoma
    PLAP; OCT4; AFP; human chorionic gonadotropin Germ cell tumors
    Hepatocyte paraffin1; canalicular pCEA, CD10, or CD13 Hepatocellular carcinoma
    RCC; CD10 Renal cell carcinoma
    TTF1; thyroglobulin Thyroid carcinoma
    Chromogranin; synaptophysin, PGP9.5; CD56 Neuroendocrine carcinoma
    CK5 or CK6; p63 Squamous cell carcinoma
    Step Three
    PSA; PAP Prostate
    TTF1 Lung
    GCDFP-15; mammaglobin; ER Breast
    CDX2; CK20 Colon
    CDX2 (intestinal epithelium); CK20; CK7 Pancreas or biliary
    ER; CA-125; mesothelin; WT1 Ovary

    Step one detects broad type of cancer. Step two detects subtype. Step three detects origin of adenocarcinoma. Positive results with any of these stains indicates a tumor is present, but without absolute certainty.
    AFP, α-fetoprotein; ER, estrogen receptor; OCT4, octamer-binding transcription factor 4; PAP, prostatic acid phosphatase; pCEA, polyclonal carcinoembryonic antigen; PLAP, placental alkaline phosphatase; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; RCC, renal cell carcinoma antigen.
  9. In up to 25% cases, a single site of origin can be narrowed down by IHC staining (e.g., TTF-1 positive and CK-1 positive lung cancer profile).

  10. Molecular diagnosis is carried out by commercially available multi-gene assays that utilize micro-array or polymerase chain reaction assays and can assist in finalizing diagnosis in up to 80% to 90% of cases in which initial IHC staining has been inconclusive.

Imaging Studies

  1. CT scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis; also CT of the neck in case of neck lymphadenopathy

  2. For selected cases

    1. PET scan

    2. Mammography and/or breast MRI

    3. Testicular ultrasonography

Treatment

  1. CUP patients often require early supportive care for their advanced cancer; also there is elevated psychosocial distress with the uncertainties of diagnosis and treatment options. Anxiety and depression are more common in CUP patients compared to patients with known primaries.

  2. Treatment is based according to the most likely site of origin for the cancer with systemic chemotherapy typically being the mainstay of therapy.

  3. Next-generation gene sequencing and in situ hybridization techniques in a large study of 1806 CUP cases were able to identify potential biomarkers predictive of therapeutic efficacy in 96% of cases. Additionally, biomarkers associated with a potential lack of benefit were identified in numerous cases, which could further refine the management of patients with CUP.

  4. Favorable and unfavorable CUP subsets are shown in Table 4.

    TABLE4 Prognostic Classification of CUP PatientsFrom Pavlidis N, Pentheroudakis G: Cancer of unknown primary site, Lancet 379(9824):1428-1435, 2012.
    Favorable Subset
    Women with papillary adenocarcinoma of the peritoneal cavity
    Women with adenocarcinoma involving the axillary lymph nodes
    Poorly differentiated carcinoma with midline distribution
    Poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma
    Squamous cell carcinoma involving cervical lymph nodes
    Adenocarcinoma with a colon-cancer profile (CK20+, CK7−, CDX2+)
    Men with blastic bone metastases and elevated prostate-specific antigen (adenocarcinoma)
    Isolated inguinal adenopathy (squamous carcinoma)
    Patients with one small, potentially resectable tumor
    Unfavorable Subset
    Adenocarcinoma metastatic to the liver or other organs
    Nonpapillary malignant ascites (adenocarcinoma)
    Multiple cerebral metastases (adenocarcinoma or squamous carcinoma)
    Several lung or pleural metastases (adenocarcinoma)
    Multiple metastatic lytic bone disease (adenocarcinoma)
    Squamous cell carcinoma of the abdominopelvic cavity
  5. Favorable CUP

    1. Women with peritoneal adenocarcinoma when treated as advanced ovarian cancer with surgical cytoreduction and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy can have median survivals in the 36-month range.

    2. Patients with a midline tumor characteristically treated as germ cell tumors have median survivals of 12 months.

    3. Patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine cancers are treated with combination platinum-containing chemotherapy and median survivals are in the 15-month range.

    4. Women with axillary nodal adenocarcinoma are approached as breast cancers with treatment plans incorporating axillary and breast surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy, hormone therapy and radiotherapy; survival rates are comparable to similarly staged breast cancers.

    5. Patients with metastatic squamous neck nodal cancer are treated as head–neck cancers with chemoradiotherapy and/or neck dissection.

    6. Patients with a colon adenocarcinoma profile are treated with systemic regimens as in metastatic colorectal cancers with median survivals in the 24-month range.

    7. Men with blastic bone metastases and elevated prostate specific antigen are treated with initial androgen deprivation therapy and later on with systemic chemotherapy.

  6. Unfavorable CUP

    1. Account for 75% to 80% of all CUP patients

    2. The most common presentation is advanced visceral disease, often with liver metastases; median survivals with systemic platinum and taxane-containing chemotherapy are typically in the range of 6 to 7 months.

Suggested Readings

  • Z. Gatalica, et al.Comprehensive tumor profiling identifies numerous biomarkers of drug response in cancers of unknown primary site: analysis of 1806 cases. Oncotarget. 5 (23):1244012447 2014 25415047

  • National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines Version 2: Occult primary (cancer of unknown primary) . Available at https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/occult.pdf, 2017.

  • N. PavlidisG. PentheroudakisCancer of unknown primary site. Lancet. 379 (9824):14281435 2012 22414598

  • R.L. Siegel, et al.Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 67:730 2017 28055103

  • G.R. VaradhacharyF.A. GrecoOverview of patient management and future directions in unknown primary carcinoma. Semin Oncol. 36 (1):7580 2009 19179191

  • G.R. VaradhacharyM.N. RaberCancer of unknown primary site. N Engl J Med. 371 (8):757765 2014 25140961